HashKey Exchange
VS
Upbit

HashKey Exchange vs Upbit: risk and licence comparison

Compare the V1 score, evidence confidence, legal-entity coverage and all five rating dimensions. This is not a recommendation to deposit.

HashKey Exchange

74Moderate Risk
Confidence
70%
Coverage
72%
Entities
3
Trend
No trend yet
Open Passport

Upbit

70Moderate Risk
Confidence
75%
Coverage
71%
Entities
2
Trend
No trend yet
Open Passport

Five dimensions

Rating comparison

Higher scores indicate stronger evidence-backed risk controls. Open each row to review the evidence basis.

V1 calculation

How the score is calculated

The overall score is a weighted sum, not a simple average. Missing evidence lowers coverage and confidence instead of being automatically scored as zero.

25%Regulatory & legal standing15%Corporate transparency20%Asset & solvency transparency15%Security & incident history25%Operations & user protection
  1. 01Score each dimension from dated, traceable evidence.
  2. 02Apply the five published weights and calculate the weighted total.
  3. 03Apply redline overrides, then the confidence-based rating cap.
Read the complete methodology
01

Regulatory & legal standing

82HashKey Exchange
78Upbit
Show scoring basis

HashKey Exchange · 82/100

香港、百慕大与迪拜三家主体可核验,品牌入口与许可边界清晰。

Input confidence 93% · 0 source records

Upbit · 78/100

Upbit 的已核验主体和地区许可按产品分别记录;未核验范围不被概括为全球统一授权。

Input confidence 88% · 1 source records
02

Corporate transparency

75HashKey Exchange
72Upbit
Show scoring basis

HashKey Exchange · 75/100

牌照、规则与控制披露较清晰;私营集团仍缺少公开合并财务报表。

Input confidence 80% · 0 source records

Upbit · 72/100

韩国和新加坡主体可识别,但区域平台边界仍需逐一核对。

Input confidence 82% · 1 source records
03

Asset & solvency transparency

68HashKey Exchange
58Upbit
Show scoring basis

HashKey Exchange · 68/100

规则披露客户资产隔离、保险与至少 90% 冷存储,但缺少高频公开的资产负债覆盖率。

Input confidence 74% · 1 source records

Upbit · 58/100

客户资产保护规则可查,但缺少可持续比较的统一链上负债覆盖率。

Input confidence 62% · 1 source records
04

Security & incident history

78HashKey Exchange
52Upbit
Show scoring basis

HashKey Exchange · 78/100

官方披露 ISO 27001/27701、保险与冷存储;未在所选来源中发现重大平台事故,不等于证明从未发生。

Input confidence 58% · 1 source records

Upbit · 52/100

历史事件与韩国平台的补偿、整改需要和其他地区入口分开评估。

Input confidence 86% · 1 source records
05

Operations & user protection

68HashKey Exchange
81Upbit
Show scoring basis

HashKey Exchange · 68/100

已接入官方维护公告与规则,但未找到统一实时状态页;该缺口会降低覆盖度与置信度,不会被自动视为负面事实。 Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

Input confidence 57% · 4 source records

Upbit · 81/100

已接入官方状态页或公告入口;没有统一实时接口时会降低覆盖度,而不是自动判定正常。 Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

Input confidence 67% · 3 source records

Other comparisons

Related comparisons

Coinbase vs HashKey ExchangeCoinbase vs UpbitBinance vs HashKey ExchangeBinance vs UpbitOKX vs HashKey ExchangeOKX vs UpbitHashKey Exchange vs KrakenUpbit vs KrakenCrypto.com vs HashKey ExchangeCrypto.com vs UpbitHashKey Exchange vs BybitUpbit vs Bybit