Exchanges / OKX

30-second risk check: OKX

OKX Risk Rating, Licences and Safety Review

okx.com · Official site verified ↗

Likely contracting entity: OKX SG Pte. Ltd.Major Payment Institution

Differences in licence scope · Moderate Risk

Is OKX safe? Cexvia rates it Moderate Risk at 74/100.

For Singapore users, the mapped entity is OKX SG Pte. Ltd. under Major Payment Institution. Its strongest area is Asset & solvency transparency; the main observed concern is Regulatory & legal standing.

Evidence for this conclusionRun the 15-point safety checklist
Cexvia Exchange Safety RatingA higher score means lower observed risk
OKX74Moderate Risk
Regulato62Corporat72Security72
Regulatory & legal standing62Corporate transparency72Asset & solvency transparency84Security & incident history72Operations & user protection80
Differences in licence scopeFor SG usersLast verified · 2026-07-27

OKX performs best in Asset & solvency transparency at 84/100. Its main risk is Regulatory & legal standing at 62/100.

  1. 01

    OKX services in Singapore, Europe and the United States map to OKX SG, OKX Europe and OKX, Inc. Regulatory strength and product scope vary by region. Evidence

Selected: SG / OKX SG Pte. Ltd. · Verified 2026-07-27

Overall safety score74Moderate Risk
Checks completed5 / 5
Rating trendNo trend yet2026-07-27
Best-performing areaAsset & solvency transparency84 / 100
Key riskRegulatory & legal standing62 / 100
Fund-storage guidanceLimited long-term custodyEvidence confidence: High · Public-data coverage: 79%
Regulatory & legal standingComplete
62score / 100Weight 25% · Confidence 93%

Service entities in three regions are verifiable. The 2025 U.S. anti-money-laundering enforcement and guilty plea increase regulatory risk.

  • 3 key legal entities
  • 2025 DOJ guilty plea
  • Penalties and forfeiture above $504m
Score contribution0.2 / 25
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the score3 key legal entities · 2025 DOJ guilty plea · Penalties and forfeiture above $504m

What users should watchService entities in three regions are verifiable. The 2025 U.S. anti-money-laundering enforcement and guilty plea increase regulatory risk.

What information is still missing?No material public-information gap currently affects this conclusion.

1 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Corporate transparencyPrimary evidence
72score / 100Weight 15% · Confidence 80%

Reserve and service-term disclosures are strong, while private-group structure and historical enforcement still reduce overall transparency.

  • Reserve disclosure: frequent
  • Legal terms: public
  • Consolidated financials: unavailable
Score contribution0.1 / 15
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreReserve disclosure: frequent · Legal terms: public · Consolidated financials: unavailable

What users should watchReserve and service-term disclosures are strong, while private-group structure and historical enforcement still reduce overall transparency.

What information is still missing?Primary evidence

0 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Asset & solvency transparencyComplete
84score / 100Weight 20% · Confidence 93%

The July 2026 proof-of-reserves report disclosed $23.12 billion in major assets, with key-asset coverage ratios at or above 100%.

  • 45th disclosure
  • Major assets: $23.12B
  • BTC coverage: 105%
Score contribution0.2 / 20
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the score45th disclosure · Major assets: $23.12B · BTC coverage: 105%

What users should watchThe July 2026 proof-of-reserves report disclosed $23.12 billion in major assets, with key-asset coverage ratios at or above 100%.

What information is still missing?No material public-information gap currently affects this conclusion.

2 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Security & incident historyPrimary evidence
72score / 100Weight 15% · Confidence 68%

No recent major loss of centralised-exchange customer assets was found in the selected official sources. Independent Web3 products are outside this conclusion.

  • Fund controls: disclosed
  • Major CEX loss: not found
  • Web3 products: excluded
Score contribution0.1 / 15
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreFund controls: disclosed · Major CEX loss: not found · Web3 products: excluded

What users should watchNo recent major loss of centralised-exchange customer assets was found in the selected official sources. Independent Web3 products are outside this conclusion.

What information is still missing?Primary evidence

1 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Operations & user protectionPrimary evidence
80score / 100Weight 25% · Confidence 69%

An official status page is connected and provides asset-level deposit and withdrawal checks. Recently listed maintenance had been completed. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

  • Asset-level status: available
  • Recent maintenance: completed
  • Anonymous reviews: not scored
  • Trust Score: 10 / 10
Score contribution0.2 / 25
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreAsset-level status: available · Recent maintenance: completed · Anonymous reviews: not scored · Trust Score: 10 / 10

What users should watchAn official status page is connected and provides asset-level deposit and withdrawal checks. Recently listed maintenance had been completed. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

What information is still missing?Primary evidence

4 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence

OKX Rating Explained

What raises or lowers the OKX rating, and what remains unknown?

Missing information reduces confidence, but Cexvia does not treat an undisclosed fact as proof of wrongdoing.

Main factors in the OKX rating

Strength
Asset & solvency transparency

The July 2026 proof-of-reserves report disclosed $23.12 billion in major assets, with key-asset coverage ratios at or above 100%.

840.2 weighted
Strength
Operations & user protection

An official status page is connected and provides asset-level deposit and withdrawal checks. Recently listed maintenance had been completed. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

800.2 weighted
Constraint
Corporate transparency

Reserve and service-term disclosures are strong, while private-group structure and historical enforcement still reduce overall transparency.

720.1 weighted
Constraint
Security & incident history

No recent major loss of centralised-exchange customer assets was found in the selected official sources. Independent Web3 products are outside this conclusion.

720.1 weighted
Constraint
Regulatory & legal standing

Service entities in three regions are verifiable. The 2025 U.S. anti-money-laundering enforcement and guilty plea increase regulatory risk.

620.2 weighted

What should users verify before deciding?

01
Corporate transparency

Public evidence for Corporate transparency remains primary evidence, so this conclusion is less certain.

02
Security & incident history

Public evidence for Security & incident history remains primary evidence, so this conclusion is less certain.

03
Operations & user protection

Public evidence for Operations & user protection remains primary evidence, so this conclusion is less certain.

04
Scope limitation

FinCEN MSB registration is not a prudential licence or an endorsement of customer-asset safety.

05
Scope limitation

This page does not cover every OKX derivatives or offshore service entity.

On-chain transparency

What can be observed on OKX's public wallets?

Beta

Observed assets, stablecoin flows and wallet coverage for publicly identified OKX addresses.

Verified wallet data has not been connected for this exchange yet.

View full on-chain data

OKX Security Monitoring

Is OKX affected by outages, hacks, phishing or complaint clusters?

9 risk-signal families tracked · 5 automated or configured · 4 require analyst review

01Live source

Official service status

The public endpoint exposes maintenance and system-disruption records.

Check frequency
Every 5 minutes
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
Sub-five-second maintenance may not be announced, according to the API documentation.OKX · OKX system status API
02Probe configured

Independent probes

Homepage, public API, DNS and TLS probes are configured.

Check frequency
Every 5 minutes
Rating impact
Context only
Reachability does not prove that login, trading or withdrawals work for every user or region.OKX · OKX public time API
03Live source

Security incidents

Trading issues, maintenance and deposit or withdrawal status are retained.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
OKX Exchange and OKX Web3 incidents are separated during entity and product review.OKX · OKX Status
04Review workflow

Reserves and wallets

Proof-of-reserves reports and disclosed wallet labels are reviewed.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
Public wallets or proof-of-reserves do not establish complete liabilities, encumbrances or solvency.OKX · OKX proof of reserves
05Review workflow

Account controls

MFA, anti-phishing, allowlisting and API-key controls are reviewed.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
The presence of a control does not establish that it is enabled by default.OKX · OKX account security
06Review workflow

Legal and regulatory

Enforcement, licence and entity records are mapped to the specific OKX company involved.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
The 2025 U.S. plea concerned Aux Cayes Fintech Co. Ltd.; it is not generalized to every regional entity.U.S. Department of Justice · OKX U.S. AML case
07Probe configured

Domain and phishing

Official-domain and certificate baselines are configured.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Context only
Regional official domains are allowlisted separately from lookalikes.Verisign RDAP · RDAP record for okx.com
08Discovery only

Vulnerability signals

Potential product and dependency matches are queued for exposure validation.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Never scored directly
Keyword matches are discovery signals only; they are never attributed to an exchange without product and exposure validation.NIST / CISA · NVD and CISA KEV
09Probe configured

Verified complaints

Official case references and structured complainant evidence can be attached to an entity and product.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Context only
Unverified posts, review-site ratings and anonymous screenshots are excluded from scoring.OKX · OKX support

OKX Safety and Regulatory News

Has OKX reported hacks, withdrawal problems or regulatory action?

View all exchange risk events

Exchange Safety, Reserves and Withdrawals

Is OKX safe? Check its reserves, security incidents and withdrawal risk.

01

Are reserves transparent and is solvency verifiable?

84/100

The July 2026 proof-of-reserves report disclosed $23.12 billion in major assets, with key-asset coverage ratios at or above 100%.

  • 45th disclosure
  • Major assets: $23.12B
  • BTC coverage: 105%
Review reserves, liabilities and asset restrictions. Publishing reserves alone does not prove that all customer claims can be repaid.
02

Has the exchange suffered hacks or major security incidents?

72/100

No recent major loss of centralised-exchange customer assets was found in the selected official sources. Independent Web3 products are outside this conclusion.

  • Fund controls: disclosed
  • Major CEX loss: not found
  • Web3 products: excluded
1 verifiable source records
03

Are withdrawals working and are users protected?

80/100

An official status page is connected and provides asset-level deposit and withdrawal checks. Recently listed maintenance had been completed.

  • Asset-level status: available
  • Recent maintenance: completed
  • Continuous status page: available
  • Anonymous reviews: not scored
  • Comparable sample: insufficient
Public complaint evidence is limited and cannot yet represent the overall user experience.

Fund-storage guidance

Limited long-term custody

How to use it
Suitable for normal trading with controlled exchange balances.
Higher-risk use
Avoid using the exchange as a single long-term custody location.
Why
Asset & solvency transparency is the strongest observed area, while Regulatory & legal standing limits a stronger conclusion.
This is general exchange-risk guidance, not personalised investment, legal or custody advice.

Account, Deposit and Withdrawal Checklist

Opening an account, holding funds or unable to withdraw? Start here.

  1. 01Verify the official domain and app publisher
  2. 02Confirm the legal entity named in the account agreement
  3. 03Check whether the selected product is covered in your region
  4. 04Start with the minimum deposit
  5. 05Test one withdrawal
  6. 06Enable strong account security
  7. 07Avoid keeping unnecessary long-term balances

OKX Rating History

Is the OKX risk rating improving or getting worse?

This is the first comparable rating snapshot. A trend will appear after the next dated review.

DateScoreRisk levelTrendScoring methodChange
74Moderate RiskNo trend yetv1.0.0

First comparable rating record

Compare Exchange Safety

How does OKX compare with other exchanges on risk and security?

Choose exchanges to compare
ExchangeRiskScoreRegulatorySecurityConfidence

Before you deposit

Run the safety checklist for OKX

Check the official domain, legal entity, licence, reserves, incident history and your exit route in one interactive worksheet.

Open safety checklist

FAQ

Questions about OKX

Is OKX safe?

OKX is currently rated Moderate Risk at 74/100. This reflects observed public evidence and is not a guarantee of safety.

Is OKX regulated?

3 legal-entity records are mapped in this Passport. Each record has a jurisdiction-specific status and scope.

Which entity serves the selected region?

Singapore: OKX SG Pte. Ltd. — Major Payment Institution.

Does OKX publish reserve or solvency evidence?

The July 2026 proof-of-reserves report disclosed $23.12 billion in major assets, with key-asset coverage ratios at or above 100%.

Should funds be stored on OKX long term?

Limited long-term custody. Suitable for normal trading with controlled exchange balances. Avoid using the exchange as a single long-term custody location.

OKX · Official Records and Verifiable Evidence

OKX licence, reserve, security and operating sources

Open the original records used to check the exchange, including the verification date and the conclusion each source supports.

01
Regulator · Monetary Authority of Singapore

MAS Directory — OKX SG Pte. Ltd.

Legal entity, MPI status, permitted activities and registered address.

Tier A
02
Platform terms · OKX

OKX EEA Terms of Service

European entity, MiCA status and listed crypto-asset services.

Tier B
03
Platform terms · OKX

OKX U.S. Licenses

U.S. entity, NMLS identifier, FinCEN registration and state-level scope.

Tier B
04
Platform terms · OKX

OKX Singapore Terms of Service

Singapore contracting entity and the stated regulatory perimeter.

Tier B
05
Platform terms · OKX

OKX Singapore licence announcement

Publication date of the Singapore full licence.

Tier B
06
Enforcement record · U.S. Department of Justice

OKX pleads guilty to U.S. AML violations

Official enforcement record used in the regulatory assessment.

Tier A
07
Reserve disclosure · OKX

OKX Proof of Reserves

Published reserve or asset-disclosure evidence used in the solvency assessment.

Tier B
08
Reserve disclosure · OKX

OKX Proof of Reserves downloads

Published reserve or asset-disclosure evidence used in the solvency assessment.

Tier B
09
Security notice · OKX

OKX security of funds

Published security or incident evidence used in the security assessment.

Tier B
10
System status · OKX

OKX status

Official service-status evidence used in the operational assessment.

Tier B
11
Evidence coverage · Cexvia methodology

Cexvia complaint evidence standard

Complaint comparisons use verifiable primary evidence. The current cross-platform sample remains limited.

Method
12
Market data · CoinGecko

OKX market data

Third-party market-quality data used as a supporting signal.

Tier B
13
Market data · CoinGecko

Trust Score methodology

CoinGecko methodology covering liquidity, cybersecurity, API coverage, team and incident signals.

Tier B
Cexvia ratings reflect observed risk under available public evidence. A higher score means lower observed risk, not guaranteed safety. Coverage, confidence, redlines and score direction are published separately. This page is not investment, legal or custody advice. Commercial relationships do not change scores or suppress verified evidence.