Regulatory and Exchange Risk
BitMart faces insolvency claim over frozen withdrawals as reported by crypto.news
Crypto.news reported that BitMart is facing fresh insolvency allegations after an OpenGradient co-founder stated that his market-making team could no longer withdraw funds locked on the exchange. This development occurs amidst an ongoing phased wind-down of the trading platform and has not officially confirmed solvency issues.

Overview of Reported Insolvency Allegations
Crypto.news reported that BitMart is facing a notable insolvency claim brought forward by Matthew, a co-founder of the decentralized artificial intelligence network OpenGradient. According to the reporting, Matthew stated publicly that his market-making team has balances trapped on the trading platform and cannot extract them. He characterized the platform's condition as insolvent, drawing widespread attention across digital asset communities regarding the exchange's liquidity management during its current operational transition.
Furthermore, the reported complaints highlighted the timing of token lockup campaigns conducted shortly before the exchange restricted services. Matthew alleged that BitMart encouraged token holders to lock assets on the platform approximately one week prior to implementing widespread service limitations. He described this sequence of events as a liquidity-driven manoeuvre, raising serious questions about the transparency and predictability of the exchange's asset handling practices during troubled periods.
Context of the Phased Exchange Shutdown
The reported withdrawal friction coincides with BitMart's phased shutdown of its global exchange services, which commenced on July 26. As documented by crypto.news, the platform stopped accepting new registrations, crypto and fiat deposits, and new spot trading orders while transitioning futures accounts to a reduce-only state. These restrictive measures form part of a structured wind-down timeline culminating in the total cessation of trading operations scheduled for January 2027.
Despite the implementation of these sweeping wind-down protocols, BitMart has consistently maintained that regular user withdrawals remain available. However, the exchange has stipulated that customer withdrawal requests may be subjected to rigorous security checks, identity verification procedures, source-of-funds reviews, and sanctions screening. Users were advised to submit withdrawal requests ahead of specific August deadlines to avoid transitioning into alternative, less-defined manual processing channels.
Founder Response and Verification Gaps
BitMart founder Sheldon Xia addressed the broader community concerns by stating that the exchange had not run away and would not abandon its obligations. Xia explained that the core organizational team was actively conducting asset inventories, consolidating remaining resources, and maintaining underlying technical systems. He promised that formal corporate announcements would follow to clarify the situation, although initial statements lacked granular reserve figures and comprehensive processing schedules.
Independent verification remains elusive because BitMart has not yet published a full, audited proof-of-reserves report. Earlier commitments made by the exchange in May to release transparency data have not materialized, leaving market participants without verifiable metrics to assess actual liabilities against reported hot and cold wallet holdings. Observers note that without comprehensive auditing, it is difficult to determine whether platform assets adequately cover pending withdrawal obligations.
Additional Project Reports and US User Restrictions
Beyond individual market maker claims, other projects have reported significant delays when attempting to extract capital from the platform. Scandic Coin publicly noted that multiple withdrawal requests involving substantial quantities of USDT and SNC remained unprocessed after being initiated on July 26. While Scandic Coin stopped short of alleging absolute insolvency, the project urged BitMart management to provide verifiable evidence confirming that sufficient liquidity exists to fulfill all outstanding user obligations.
Concurrently, regulatory and jurisdictional limitations have impacted legacy accounts, particularly those associated with the United States. Although BitMart restricted new US registrations in May 2022, certain older accounts remained accessible. The platform instructed these remaining US residents to close open positions, redeem assets, and withdraw their crypto holdings by early August, warning that further compliance hurdles and severe restrictions would apply to unaddressed accounts.
Market Implications and Analytical Perspectives
The unfolding situation at BitMart bears structural resemblances to previous centralized exchange wind-downs, such as instances involving AscendEX, where prolonged withdrawal queues and shrinking hot wallet liquidity preceded formal operational closures. Industry analysts emphasize that abrupt changes in withdrawal processing efficiency often serve as primary indicators of underlying distress, regardless of official corporate communications asserting orderly liquidations.
Furthermore, the absence of real-time transparency tools across many centralized intermediaries continues to expose institutional and retail participants to unexpected counterparty risks. When exchanges initiate phased shutdowns without transparent liabilities reporting, market makers like OpenGradient and various token projects find themselves disproportionately vulnerable to trapped liquidity and protracted legal uncertainties.
Conclusion and Actionable Recommendations
In conclusion, crypto.news reported that BitMart is facing an unconfirmed insolvency allegation from an OpenGradient co-founder alongside documented withdrawal delays experienced by projects like Scandic Coin and general market participants. While the platform's founder Sheldon Xia denied asset misuse and maintained that orderly wind-down procedures are underway, the complete lack of published proof-of-reserves data leaves the insolvency claims unproven and officially unconfirmed. Affected users and institutional market makers must treat their remaining balances as high-risk assets.
Going forward, affected participants must immediately prioritize extracting any accessible funds before the impending platform closure milestones while strictly following requested compliance verifications. Users should preserve all transaction logs, communication records, and error screenshots related to pending withdrawals. Independent risk intelligence will continue to monitor whether BitMart releases verified solvency data or if further regulatory actions emerge as the January 2027 shutdown date approaches.
Cexvia conclusion
Conclusion and Risk Assessment
Crypto.news reported that BitMart is facing an insolvency claim from an OpenGradient co-founder over frozen withdrawals during its wind-down, though these allegations are not officially confirmed and BitMart maintains that withdrawals remain open.
- Risk meaning
- The situation demonstrates how secondary market makers and institutional participants face severe operational friction and settlement risks during centralized exchange wind-down procedures, complicating asset recovery.
- User action
- Affected users and market makers should immediately attempt to withdraw remaining balances, complete requested compliance verifications, and preserve documentation of pending transactions.

