Upbit
VS
Gate

Upbit vs Gate: risk and licence comparison

Compare the V1 score, evidence confidence, legal-entity coverage and all five rating dimensions. This is not a recommendation to deposit.

Five dimensions

Rating comparison

Higher scores indicate stronger evidence-backed risk controls. Open each row to review the evidence basis.

V1 calculation

How the score is calculated

The overall score is a weighted sum, not a simple average. Missing evidence lowers coverage and confidence instead of being automatically scored as zero.

25%Regulatory & legal standing15%Corporate transparency20%Asset & solvency transparency15%Security & incident history25%Operations & user protection
  1. 01Score each dimension from dated, traceable evidence.
  2. 02Apply the five published weights and calculate the weighted total.
  3. 03Apply redline overrides, then the confidence-based rating cap.
Read the complete methodology
01

Regulatory & legal standing

78Upbit
76Gate
Show scoring basis

Upbit · 78/100

Upbit 的已核验主体和地区许可按产品分别记录;未核验范围不被概括为全球统一授权。

Input confidence 88% · 1 source records

Gate · 76/100

Gate 的已核验主体和地区许可按产品分别记录;未核验范围不被概括为全球统一授权。

Input confidence 92% · 1 source records
02

Corporate transparency

72Upbit
70Gate
Show scoring basis

Upbit · 72/100

韩国和新加坡主体可识别,但区域平台边界仍需逐一核对。

Input confidence 82% · 1 source records

Gate · 70/100

Gate 明确披露多个独立区域主体,但全球入口仍需根据地区条款判断。

Input confidence 86% · 1 source records
03

Asset & solvency transparency

58Upbit
66Gate
Show scoring basis

Upbit · 58/100

客户资产保护规则可查,但缺少可持续比较的统一链上负债覆盖率。

Input confidence 62% · 1 source records

Gate · 66/100

储备证明提供资产验证信号,但完整负债、权利负担和集团偿付能力仍不可见。

Input confidence 78% · 1 source records
04

Security & incident history

52Upbit
50Gate
Show scoring basis

Upbit · 52/100

历史事件与韩国平台的补偿、整改需要和其他地区入口分开评估。

Input confidence 86% · 1 source records

Gate · 50/100

历史安全事件会保留在品牌记录中;当前控制披露不能抹除历史风险。

Input confidence 84% · 1 source records
05

Operations & user protection

81Upbit
79Gate
Show scoring basis

Upbit · 81/100

已接入官方状态页或公告入口;没有统一实时接口时会降低覆盖度,而不是自动判定正常。 Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

Input confidence 67% · 3 source records

Gate · 79/100

已接入官方状态页或公告入口;没有统一实时接口时会降低覆盖度,而不是自动判定正常。 Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

Input confidence 64% · 3 source records

Other comparisons

All 14-exchange pairings

Coinbase vs Crypto.comCoinbase vs OKXCoinbase vs BinanceCoinbase vs HashKey ExchangeCoinbase vs UpbitCoinbase vs BybitCoinbase vs BitgetCoinbase vs GateCoinbase vs KuCoinCoinbase vs MEXCCoinbase vs HTXCoinbase vs KrakenCoinbase vs Backpack ExchangeCrypto.com vs OKXCrypto.com vs BinanceCrypto.com vs HashKey ExchangeCrypto.com vs UpbitCrypto.com vs BybitCrypto.com vs BitgetCrypto.com vs GateCrypto.com vs KuCoinCrypto.com vs MEXCCrypto.com vs HTXCrypto.com vs KrakenCrypto.com vs Backpack ExchangeOKX vs BinanceOKX vs HashKey ExchangeOKX vs UpbitOKX vs BybitOKX vs BitgetOKX vs GateOKX vs KuCoinOKX vs MEXCOKX vs HTXOKX vs KrakenOKX vs Backpack ExchangeBinance vs HashKey ExchangeBinance vs UpbitBinance vs BybitBinance vs BitgetBinance vs GateBinance vs KuCoinBinance vs MEXCBinance vs HTXBinance vs KrakenBinance vs Backpack ExchangeHashKey Exchange vs UpbitHashKey Exchange vs BybitHashKey Exchange vs BitgetHashKey Exchange vs GateHashKey Exchange vs KuCoinHashKey Exchange vs MEXCHashKey Exchange vs HTXHashKey Exchange vs KrakenHashKey Exchange vs Backpack ExchangeUpbit vs BybitUpbit vs BitgetUpbit vs GateUpbit vs KuCoinUpbit vs MEXCUpbit vs HTXUpbit vs KrakenUpbit vs Backpack ExchangeBybit vs BitgetBybit vs GateBybit vs KuCoinBybit vs MEXCBybit vs HTXBybit vs KrakenBybit vs Backpack ExchangeBitget vs GateBitget vs KuCoinBitget vs MEXCBitget vs HTXBitget vs KrakenBitget vs Backpack ExchangeGate vs KuCoinGate vs MEXCGate vs HTXGate vs KrakenGate vs Backpack ExchangeKuCoin vs MEXCKuCoin vs HTXKuCoin vs KrakenKuCoin vs Backpack ExchangeMEXC vs HTXMEXC vs KrakenMEXC vs Backpack ExchangeHTX vs KrakenHTX vs Backpack ExchangeKraken vs Backpack Exchange