Binance Policy Change Reportedly Slows Foreign Law Enforcement Access to User Data

Background of the Reported Policy Change

The New York Times has published a report alleging that Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has quietly altered its compliance procedures regarding law enforcement requests for user data. According to the article, this change was implemented in April 2025 and affects how foreign law enforcement agencies interact with Binance when seeking information for criminal investigations. Previously, Binance reportedly cooperated directly with authorities, enabling faster responses to requests for freezing accounts or providing user information. The new policy, however, is said to require most requests to be routed through the United Arab Emirates and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs), which are formal government-to-government channels. This information is not officially confirmed and is based solely on media reporting.

The report highlights that the change has frustrated investigators from multiple countries, particularly in Europe and the United States. During a law enforcement conference in the Netherlands, officials from five European countries reportedly described increased difficulties in obtaining information from Binance. The new procedures are said to substantially increase response times, making it harder to track scammers, combat money laundering, and quickly freeze or seize assets. Binance’s regulated entities in the UAE operate under Abu Dhabi Global Market, and the company insists that its cooperation with authorities remains robust. The findings remain not officially confirmed, and no official or first-party source has verified the claims.

Details of the Compliance Policy Adjustment

According to The New York Times, Binance’s new policy directs most foreign law enforcement requests through the government of the United Arab Emirates, where Binance has regulated operations. Requests must now be processed via MLATs, which are formal treaties used for exchanging evidence and information in criminal investigations. While MLATs provide a structured framework, they are widely recognized as slower compared to direct cooperation with private entities. The report cites a senior European law enforcement official who claims that the increased reliance on MLATs has substantially delayed access to user records, impacting the outcome of investigations.

Binance reportedly continues to respond directly in cases involving child sexual abuse material, terrorism, or imminent threats to life. For all other requests, the new procedures are said to apply. The company’s spokesperson told CoinDesk that Binance has not slowed its cooperation with global law enforcement and, in fact, has increased collaboration year over year. Binance frames the policy change as a deliberate strengthening of controls and safeguards, aligning with the standards expected of regulated financial institutions. The spokesperson also emphasized that Binance’s assistance goes beyond legal obligations and what traditional financial services firms typically provide. These statements are attributed to Binance’s representatives and have not been officially confirmed by regulators or law enforcement agencies.

zh-CN

Impact on Law Enforcement and Investigations

The New York Times report suggests that the policy change has made it more challenging for international law enforcement agencies to obtain timely information from Binance. European investigators and U.S. prosecutors are cited as saying that the new procedures hinder their ability to track scammers, combat money laundering, and freeze or seize assets quickly. The reliance on MLATs and UAE government channels introduces additional bureaucratic steps, which can extend response times from days to weeks or even months. This delay is particularly problematic in cases where speed is critical to preventing further criminal activity or recovering stolen assets.

The report notes that the outcome of investigations often depends on how quickly records can be obtained. Alona Katz, an assistant district attorney in Brooklyn, is quoted as saying that the speed of access to records determines the outcome of cases. While Binance maintains that its cooperation has not decreased, law enforcement officials reportedly experience increased frustration and difficulty. The impact is most pronounced in cases that do not involve imminent threats, where direct cooperation is no longer available. These claims are based on media reporting and remain not officially confirmed.

zh-CN

Binance’s Response and Ongoing Scrutiny

Binance has publicly denied that its cooperation with law enforcement has diminished. In statements to CoinDesk, the company asserts that it has increased collaboration with authorities year over year, despite the growing complexity of government approaches to crypto regulation and data protection. Binance emphasizes that the new procedures are intended to strengthen controls and safeguards, consistent with the expectations for regulated financial institutions. The company also claims that its assistance to law enforcement exceeds legal requirements and industry norms.

The New York Times report follows similar coverage from The Information, which cited a U.S. Justice Department memo warning federal prosecutors to expect less assistance from Binance when seeking to freeze or seize assets. Binance denied any change in its cooperation with U.S. authorities. The Wall Street Journal and Fortune have also reported on Binance’s compliance operations, including allegations of dismissing employees who investigated transactions linked to Iran. Binance has rejected these allegations, accusing the publications of relying on false or defamatory claims. These ongoing media reports contribute to the scrutiny of Binance’s compliance practices, but none have been officially confirmed by regulators or law enforcement agencies.

zh-CN

Procedural and Regulatory Implications

The reported policy change at Binance has procedural implications for both law enforcement agencies and users. For investigators, the shift to MLATs and UAE government channels means that requests for user data must follow formal diplomatic processes, which are inherently slower and more complex. This can affect the efficiency of criminal investigations, particularly in cases where rapid response is necessary to prevent loss or further criminal activity. The change also raises questions about the balance between regulatory compliance, user privacy, and law enforcement needs.

From a regulatory perspective, the media reports highlight ongoing debates about how crypto exchanges should cooperate with authorities. Binance’s framing of the policy as a regulatory safeguard suggests a move toward stricter compliance standards, but the practical effect may be reduced responsiveness to law enforcement. The lack of official confirmation leaves uncertainty about the true nature and scope of the changes. Users and stakeholders should monitor for further developments and await official statements from regulators or Binance itself before drawing firm conclusions.

zh-CN

What Remains Unconfirmed and Next Steps

The New York Times report provides detailed allegations about Binance’s compliance policy change and its impact on law enforcement access to user data. However, these claims have not been officially confirmed by Binance, regulators, or law enforcement agencies. The company denies any reduction in cooperation and asserts that the new procedures are intended to enhance regulatory safeguards. The practical effects described by investigators and prosecutors remain based on media reporting, and the true scope of the changes is unclear.

The affected entity is Binance, and the impacted user group includes international law enforcement agencies and users whose data may be requested. What changes now is the increased reliance on government treaties and formal channels for data requests, potentially slowing investigations. The next action is to monitor for official confirmation, regulatory responses, and further clarification from Binance. Stakeholders should remain vigilant and await authoritative statements before making operational or compliance adjustments.

zh-CN