Exchanges / Binance

30-second risk check: Binance

Binance Risk Rating, Licences and Safety Review

binance.com · Official site verified ↗

Likely contracting entity: Binance Japan Inc.Crypto-asset Exchange Service Provider

Licence status change · Moderate Risk

Is Binance safe? Cexvia rates it Moderate Risk at 71/100.

For Japan users, the mapped entity is Binance Japan Inc. under Crypto-asset Exchange Service Provider. Its strongest area is Asset & solvency transparency; the main observed concern is Regulatory & legal standing.

Evidence for this conclusionRun the 15-point safety checklist
Cexvia Exchange Safety RatingA higher score means lower observed risk
Binance71Moderate Risk
Regulato55Security62Corporat64
Regulatory & legal standing55Corporate transparency64Asset & solvency transparency85Security & incident history62Operations & user protection84
Licence status changeFor JP usersLast verified · 2026-07-27

Binance performs best in Asset & solvency transparency at 85/100. Its main risk is Regulatory & legal standing at 55/100.

  1. 01

    Binance Japan and Binance FZE currently have verifiable local regulatory records. The former Binance France SAS PSAN registration expired in July 2026 and must not be presented as an active licence. Evidence

Selected: JP / Binance Japan Inc. · Verified 2026-07-27

Overall safety score71Moderate Risk
Checks completed5 / 5
Rating trendNo trend yet2026-07-27
Best-performing areaAsset & solvency transparency85 / 100
Key riskRegulatory & legal standing55 / 100
Fund-storage guidanceLimited long-term custodyEvidence confidence: High · Public-data coverage: 82%
Regulatory & legal standingComplete
55score / 100Weight 25% · Confidence 94%

Japan and Dubai records are active. The former French PSAN record expired on 2 July 2026 and cannot be treated as current authorisation.

  • Active entities: 2
  • Expired records: 1
  • France expiry: 2026-07-02
Score contribution0.1 / 25
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreActive entities: 2 · Expired records: 1 · France expiry: 2026-07-02

What users should watchJapan and Dubai records are active. The former French PSAN record expired on 2 July 2026 and cannot be treated as current authorisation.

What information is still missing?No material public-information gap currently affects this conclusion.

0 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Corporate transparencyPrimary evidence
64score / 100Weight 15% · Confidence 78%

Reserve and regional terms are public, but the group structure is complex and consolidated audited financial statements are not publicly available.

  • Reserve disclosure: ongoing
  • Regional terms: public
  • Consolidated financials: unavailable
Score contribution0.1 / 15
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreReserve disclosure: ongoing · Regional terms: public · Consolidated financials: unavailable

What users should watchReserve and regional terms are public, but the group structure is complex and consolidated audited financial statements are not publicly available.

What information is still missing?Primary evidence

0 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Asset & solvency transparencyComplete
85score / 100Weight 20% · Confidence 90%

July 2026 disclosures showed key-asset reserve ratios at or above 100% and provided zk-SNARK and Merkle-based user verification.

  • BTC: 100.08%
  • USDT: 103.49%
  • USDC: 108.67%
Score contribution0.2 / 20
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreBTC: 100.08% · USDT: 103.49% · USDC: 108.67%

What users should watchJuly 2026 disclosures showed key-asset reserve ratios at or above 100% and provided zk-SNARK and Merkle-based user verification.

What information is still missing?No material public-information gap currently affects this conclusion.

2 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Security & incident historyComplete
62score / 100Weight 15% · Confidence 90%

A 2019 hot-wallet breach involved 7,000 BTC. Binance said user losses were covered by SAFU, which was approximately $1 billion in 2026.

  • 2019 breach: 7,000 BTC
  • Users: covered by SAFU
  • 2026 SAFU: about $1B
Score contribution0.1 / 15
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the score2019 breach: 7,000 BTC · Users: covered by SAFU · 2026 SAFU: about $1B

What users should watchA 2019 hot-wallet breach involved 7,000 BTC. Binance said user losses were covered by SAFU, which was approximately $1 billion in 2026.

What information is still missing?No material public-information gap currently affects this conclusion.

2 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence
Operations & user protectionPrimary evidence
84score / 100Weight 25% · Confidence 66%

The official system-status API returned normal at the review point. Asset-level maintenance must still be checked individually. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

  • System status: normal
  • API status code: 0
  • Anonymous reviews: not scored
  • Trust Score: 10 / 10
Score contribution0.2 / 25
Why did this area receive this score?

Evidence supporting the scoreSystem status: normal · API status code: 0 · Anonymous reviews: not scored · Trust Score: 10 / 10

What users should watchThe official system-status API returned normal at the review point. Asset-level maintenance must still be checked individually. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

What information is still missing?Primary evidence

4 source records · Reviewed 2026-07-27
Open the original evidence

Binance Rating Explained

What raises or lowers the Binance rating, and what remains unknown?

Missing information reduces confidence, but Cexvia does not treat an undisclosed fact as proof of wrongdoing.

Main factors in the Binance rating

Strength
Asset & solvency transparency

July 2026 disclosures showed key-asset reserve ratios at or above 100% and provided zk-SNARK and Merkle-based user verification.

850.2 weighted
Strength
Operations & user protection

The official system-status API returned normal at the review point. Asset-level maintenance must still be checked individually. Complaint evidence remains limited and is not treated as proof of safety.

840.2 weighted
Constraint
Corporate transparency

Reserve and regional terms are public, but the group structure is complex and consolidated audited financial statements are not publicly available.

640.1 weighted
Constraint
Security & incident history

A 2019 hot-wallet breach involved 7,000 BTC. Binance said user losses were covered by SAFU, which was approximately $1 billion in 2026.

620.1 weighted
Constraint
Regulatory & legal standing

Japan and Dubai records are active. The former French PSAN record expired on 2 July 2026 and cannot be treated as current authorisation.

550.1 weighted

What should users verify before deciding?

01
Corporate transparency

Public evidence for Corporate transparency remains primary evidence, so this conclusion is less certain.

02
Operations & user protection

Public evidence for Operations & user protection remains primary evidence, so this conclusion is less certain.

03
Scope limitation

These three records do not establish one global regulatory status for Binance.

04
Scope limitation

The French record is retained to show a status change, not current authorisation.

05
Scope limitation

This page is not a complete legal-entity tree for every Binance offshore operation.

On-chain transparency

What can be observed on Binance's public wallets?

Beta

Observed assets, stablecoin flows and wallet coverage for publicly identified Binance addresses.

Verified wallet data has not been connected for this exchange yet.

View full on-chain data

Binance Security Monitoring

Is Binance affected by outages, hacks, phishing or complaint clusters?

9 risk-signal families tracked · 3 automated or configured · 6 require analyst review

01Review workflow

Official service status

Maintenance, wallet and service announcements are monitored; no unified public global status API is claimed.

Check frequency
Every 15 minutes + review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
Global and regional Binance services must be separated during review.Binance · Binance announcements
02Probe configured

Independent probes

Homepage, public API, DNS and TLS probes are configured.

Check frequency
Every 5 minutes
Rating impact
Context only
Reachability does not prove that login, trading or withdrawals work for every user or region.Binance · Binance public time API
03Review workflow

Security incidents

Security, service and remediation announcements are reviewed alongside regulator and law-enforcement records.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
BNB Chain, Binance Wallet and the centralized exchange are treated as separate products.Binance · Binance security and service announcements
04Review workflow

Reserves and wallets

Published proof-of-reserves snapshots and wallet labels are reviewed.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
Public wallets or proof-of-reserves do not establish complete liabilities, encumbrances or solvency.Binance · Binance proof of reserves
05Review workflow

Account controls

MFA, passkeys, anti-phishing, address management and API controls are reviewed.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Eligible after validation
Controls and recovery procedures can differ by regional entity and product.Binance · Binance security
07Probe configured

Domain and phishing

Official-domain and certificate baselines are configured.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Context only
Many regional and product domains require an explicit official allowlist.Verisign RDAP · RDAP record for binance.com
08Discovery only

Vulnerability signals

Potential product and dependency matches are queued for validation.

Check frequency
Daily
Rating impact
Never scored directly
Keyword matches are discovery signals only; they are never attributed to an exchange without product and exposure validation.NIST / CISA · NVD and CISA KEV
09Probe configured

Verified complaints

Official cases and structured evidence can be attached to the relevant regional entity.

Check frequency
On change + weekly review
Rating impact
Context only
Unverified posts, review-site ratings and anonymous screenshots are excluded from scoring.Binance · Binance support

Binance Safety and Regulatory News

Has Binance reported hacks, withdrawal problems or regulatory action?

View all exchange risk events

Exchange Safety, Reserves and Withdrawals

Is Binance safe? Check its reserves, security incidents and withdrawal risk.

01

Are reserves transparent and is solvency verifiable?

85/100

July 2026 disclosures showed key-asset reserve ratios at or above 100% and provided zk-SNARK and Merkle-based user verification.

  • BTC: 100.08%
  • USDT: 103.49%
  • USDC: 108.67%
Review reserves, liabilities and asset restrictions. Publishing reserves alone does not prove that all customer claims can be repaid.
02

Has the exchange suffered hacks or major security incidents?

62/100

A 2019 hot-wallet breach involved 7,000 BTC. Binance said user losses were covered by SAFU, which was approximately $1 billion in 2026.

  • 2019 breach: 7,000 BTC
  • Users: covered by SAFU
  • 2026 SAFU: about $1B
2 verifiable source records
03

Are withdrawals working and are users protected?

84/100

The official system-status API returned normal at the review point. Asset-level maintenance must still be checked individually.

  • System status: normal
  • API status code: 0
  • Asset status: check individually
  • Anonymous reviews: not scored
  • Comparable sample: insufficient
Public complaint evidence is limited and cannot yet represent the overall user experience.

Fund-storage guidance

Limited long-term custody

How to use it
Suitable for normal trading with controlled exchange balances.
Higher-risk use
Avoid using the exchange as a single long-term custody location.
Why
Asset & solvency transparency is the strongest observed area, while Regulatory & legal standing limits a stronger conclusion.
This is general exchange-risk guidance, not personalised investment, legal or custody advice.

Account, Deposit and Withdrawal Checklist

Opening an account, holding funds or unable to withdraw? Start here.

  1. 01Verify the official domain and app publisher
  2. 02Confirm the legal entity named in the account agreement
  3. 03Check whether the selected product is covered in your region
  4. 04Start with the minimum deposit
  5. 05Test one withdrawal
  6. 06Enable strong account security
  7. 07Avoid keeping unnecessary long-term balances

Binance Rating History

Is the Binance risk rating improving or getting worse?

This is the first comparable rating snapshot. A trend will appear after the next dated review.

DateScoreRisk levelTrendScoring methodChange
71Moderate RiskNo trend yetv1.0.0

First comparable rating record

Compare Exchange Safety

How does Binance compare with other exchanges on risk and security?

Choose exchanges to compare
ExchangeRiskScoreRegulatorySecurityConfidence

Before you deposit

Run the safety checklist for Binance

Check the official domain, legal entity, licence, reserves, incident history and your exit route in one interactive worksheet.

Open safety checklist

FAQ

Questions about Binance

Is Binance safe?

Binance is currently rated Moderate Risk at 71/100. This reflects observed public evidence and is not a guarantee of safety.

Is Binance regulated?

3 legal-entity records are mapped in this Passport. Each record has a jurisdiction-specific status and scope.

Which entity serves the selected region?

Japan: Binance Japan Inc. — Crypto-asset Exchange Service Provider.

Does Binance publish reserve or solvency evidence?

July 2026 disclosures showed key-asset reserve ratios at or above 100% and provided zk-SNARK and Merkle-based user verification.

Should funds be stored on Binance long term?

Limited long-term custody. Suitable for normal trading with controlled exchange balances. Avoid using the exchange as a single long-term custody location.

Binance · Official Records and Verifiable Evidence

Binance licence, reserve, security and operating sources

Open the original records used to check the exchange, including the verification date and the conclusion each source supports.

01
Regulator · Financial Services Agency of Japan

Registered Crypto-asset Exchange Service Providers

Legal entity, corporate number, registration number, date and address.

Tier A
02
Regulator · Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority

VARA Public Register — Binance FZE

Legal entity, licence number, status, issue date and authorised activities.

Tier A
03
Regulator · Autorité des marchés financiers

Liste des PSAN radiés

French entity, historical registration number and expiry status dated 2 July 2026.

Tier A
04
Platform terms · Binance

Binance Japan

Japan brand site, local entity and registration disclosure.

Tier B
05
Regulator · Financial Services Agency of Japan

FSA historical warning — Binance Holdings Limited

Historical evidence used to distinguish the warned entity from the current Japan entity.

Tier A
06
Reserve disclosure · Binance

Binance Proof of Reserves

Published reserve or asset-disclosure evidence used in the solvency assessment.

Tier B
07
Reserve disclosure · Binance Academy

How Proof of Reserves works on Binance

Published reserve or asset-disclosure evidence used in the solvency assessment.

Tier B
08
Security notice · TechCrunch

Binance breach

Published security or incident evidence used in the security assessment.

Tier B
09
Security notice · Binance Academy

Secure Asset Fund for Users

Published security or incident evidence used in the security assessment.

Tier B
10
System status · Binance

Binance system status API

Official service-status evidence used in the operational assessment.

Tier B
11
Evidence coverage · Cexvia methodology

Cexvia complaint evidence standard

Complaint comparisons use verifiable primary evidence. The current cross-platform sample remains limited.

Method
12
Market data · CoinGecko

Binance market data

Third-party market-quality data used as a supporting signal.

Tier B
13
Market data · CoinGecko

Trust Score methodology

CoinGecko methodology covering liquidity, cybersecurity, API coverage, team and incident signals.

Tier B
Cexvia ratings reflect observed risk under available public evidence. A higher score means lower observed risk, not guaranteed safety. Coverage, confidence, redlines and score direction are published separately. This page is not investment, legal or custody advice. Commercial relationships do not change scores or suppress verified evidence.